Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. The vivo X60 Pro construction is incredibly newer, a bit lighter and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017). Vivo X60 Pro features a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger display, a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels. Vivo X60 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 17% greater battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way better resolution back facing camera, a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.