Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the vivo X60 Pro has the newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it offers lots of additional features and performance optimizations. The vivo X60 Pro design is newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy A70.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2376 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A70 counts with a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with higher video frame rates and a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.