Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than the vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide all the same operating system features. The Galaxy A71 has the same weight and thickness than vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 takes just a bit better photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A71 has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a bit longer battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.