Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is an a little thicker and a bit heavier phone than the vivo X60 Pro. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixel density. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.