Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a global score of 79.2, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is older and just a bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro, it's body is still just a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 40% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.