Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a general score of 85.2 against 78.8. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also a much older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier phone. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376.
The vivo X60 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit more storage for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh. Vivo X60 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much larger camera sensor, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.