Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-04-02 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Alpha's score of 76.3. Vivo X60 Pro is a somewhat thicker and notably heavier phone than Galaxy Alpha. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has 11 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy Alpha has a bit sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a just a little worse pixel density, a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720 and a lot smaller display. Vivo X60 Pro has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster video frame rates, a larger camera aperture and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 1860mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.