Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than the vivo X60 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 78.8. Although it's the best cellphone in our current comparison, Galaxy F62's body is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
Galaxy F62 has a little bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy F62 features more storage to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 6 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Galaxy F62 features a way better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.