Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a 97.6 score against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is a little bit thinner than vivo X60 Pro, although it is a lot heavier and was released around 18 months before. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, so it gives a couple additional features.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Fold. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy Fold counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.