Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, blue and white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | PLS |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy M12 is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting an 80 score against 78.8. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, we must tell that it is also a somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy M12 has the previous 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro features a brighter screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
Vivo X60 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations. The vivo X60 Pro features slightly more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M12, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M12 has a very superior battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.