Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a score of 78.9 against 78.8. The Galaxy M20 is a way older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M20 has 10 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
Vivo X60 Pro features a faster CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little larger screen.
The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos, a way better video definition, a lot bigger sensor and a much more megapixels back facing camera. The vivo X60 Pro has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy M20 has improved battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.