Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M21 has a score of 84.1, which is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy M21 body is older, thicker and a bit heavier than the vivo X60 Pro. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M21, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M21 counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel density.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M21, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy M21, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy M21 features a really longer battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.