Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a global score of 82.4, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M30 has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, counting with some extra features. Samsung Galaxy M30 is a notably older and a little thicker device than vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung could make it a little bit lighter anyway.
Vivo X60 Pro has a better hardware performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a little larger display, a little bit higher pixel count in each inch of display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2376px resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a way more mega pixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography. The Galaxy M30 features just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has better battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.