Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has a general score of 85, which is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact Galaxy M40 is older and just a bit thicker than vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
The vivo X60 Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much more mega pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.