Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy M51 is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2376.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better storage for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with just a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.