Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a global score of 90.8 against 78.8. Although it's the best phone we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little bit heavier and a little thicker phone than the vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro has a little better processing power than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much better resolution back camera and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy Note 20 features a little better battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.