Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the vivo X60 Pro, it must be told that it is also a somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker phone. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some extra features and better performance.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit bigger screen and a better display pixel density.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit longer battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better pictures and videos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a way higher video quality and a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.