Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is just a little lighter than the vivo X60 Pro, although it is just a bit thicker and was released 8 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen. Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way bigger back camera sensor and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Vivo X60 Pro has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 31% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.