Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Galaxy Note 5's construction has the same thickness than the vivo X60 Pro, but it's just a little lighter. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a better performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster video frame rates, a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 40 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.