Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is noticeably older and a little bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro, it's body is still just a little bit lighter. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The vivo X60 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh. Vivo X60 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.