Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than the vivo X60 Pro, with an 89 score against 78.8. Galaxy Note10 is an older and just a little thicker device than the vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it just a little lighter anyway. The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a little bit bigger display.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to vivo X60 Pro's one, both have the same 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.