Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Galaxy Note10 Lite is an older, heavier and thicker phone than vivo X60 Pro. Both devices we compare here have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater display density. The vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features more memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.