Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's general score of 77.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Even though vivo X60 Pro is just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, it's a bit thinner and much newer.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has 9 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. The vivo X60 Pro features a slightly better display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2376 resolution, a larger display and a bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Vivo X60 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Vivo X60 Pro has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 31% larger battery capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.