Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note4's 77.6 global score. Vivo X60 Pro's body is newer and a little thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy Note4. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note4 features a bit more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher screen density. The vivo X60 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low light environments, a back camera with way more megapixels and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos.
The vivo X60 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.