Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a score of 79.5 against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy Note7's construction is a bit lighter than the vivo X60 Pro, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released 5 years before. The vivo X60 Pro features a quite superior processing power than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display. Vivo X60 Pro features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro has better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 20% larger battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate, a way more mega-pixels back camera and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.