Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 has a score of 83, which is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Although it's the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also a older, somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier device. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note8 has newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a little sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher pixel number in each inch of display. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way better resolution camera and a much bigger camera sensor.
Vivo X60 Pro has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.