Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than vivo X60 Pro, with an 88.3 score against 78.8. Galaxy S10's construction is lighter than vivo X60 Pro, but it's just a bit thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better processor than Galaxy S10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.