Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy S10 5G design is older, just a little heavier and a little bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a slightly better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a little larger display, more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040. Vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a much more mega pixels camera.
The vivo X60 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G feature extremely similar memory for games and applications, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.