Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting an 89.7 score against 78.8. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is an older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier phone than vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have a 48 mega-pixels camera, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit longer battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.