Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. The Galaxy S10e is a older and a little thicker cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter anyway. The vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density. The Galaxy S10e features slightly more memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The vivo X60 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.