Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than vivo X60 Pro, with a 94.8 score against 78.8. Galaxy S20's design is just a little lighter than vivo X60 Pro, but it is just a bit thicker and was released around a year before. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S20. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 12 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better display density.
The vivo X60 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy S20 features a better memory to install applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Vivo X60 Pro features a little better battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.