Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Galaxy S20 FE's body is just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 FE features a screen that's very similar to the vivo X60 Pro one, because although the Galaxy S20 FE has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Vivo X60 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit longer battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.