Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a better count of pixels per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen. Vivo X60 Pro features a little better performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot more megapixels back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features more storage to install applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features greater battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.