Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. Both devices in this comparison review have the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy S21 FE's design is newer and just a bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than vivo X60 Pro. Galaxy S21 FE features a screen that is just as good as vivo X60 Pro's display, because although the Galaxy S21 FE has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit superior battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh. Vivo X60 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.