Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a overall score of 93.4 against 78.8. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, counting with some extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy S22 design has the same thickness than vivo X60 Pro, but it's a little bit lighter.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
The Galaxy S22 has just a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a more MP camera in the back, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Vivo X60 Pro has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.