Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a 95.4 score against 78.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than the vivo X60 Pro.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better display than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and more pixels per inch of display. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor, a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a way better video quality. The vivo X60 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.