Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-02 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. The Galaxy S25 body is extremely thinner and incredibly lighter than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, giving you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S25 features a brighter display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite better screen pixel density. The vivo X60 Pro counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Galaxy S25 has just a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a much larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures, a back facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.