Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-02 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot thinner and much lighter phone than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better display than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a bit larger display. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the vivo X60 Pro one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a camera with a lot better resolution, a lot higher video definition, a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features greater battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.