Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a 79.5 score against 78.8. Despite of the fact Galaxy S7 is notably older and just a bit thicker than vivo X60 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. The vivo X60 Pro has a faster processor than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The vivo X60 Pro has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a larger back camera sensor, a back camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.