Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. The vivo X60 Pro body is a lot newer, extremely thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active features a more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro features a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 8 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little better battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.