Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 global score. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but vivo X60 Pro has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Vivo X60 Pro's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, but it is somewhat heavier.
The vivo X60 Pro has a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S7 edge features a bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen pixel density.
Vivo X60 Pro has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.