Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having an 81.9 score against 78.8. Although it's the best in this review, Galaxy S8 Active is an a lot older, thicker and heavier cellphone than vivo X60 Pro. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a little sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The vivo X60 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor and better video frame rates.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.