Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.77 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a 78.8 score against 77.6. The vivo X60 Pro body is noticeably lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Both of these devices use Android OS, but vivo X60 Pro has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little lower 1080 x 2376px resolution, they both have a screen with the same size. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The vivo X60 Pro features an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a worse 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.