Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a overall score of 80.1 against 78.8. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, we must note that it is also older, a lot thicker and a lot heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little longer battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.