Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a score of 81 against 78.8. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy XCover Pro's body is older, extremely thicker and heavier than vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.