Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, counting with some extra features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older and just a little bit heavier than the vivo X60 Pro, it's design is still just a little bit thinner.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
The vivo X60 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and vivo X60 Pro have really similar storage for games and applications, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro features improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.