Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. These devices use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the vivo X60 Pro were only released 8 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is a little bit heavier but also just a bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636, a quite larger screen and a little bit more pixels per screen inch. Vivo X60 Pro features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G's storage to store more apps and games is just as good as the vivo X60 Pro one, both of them have equal internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery size. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.