Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.77 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than vivo X60 Pro, with a score of 90.6 against 78.8. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 and vivo X60 Pro were released with only 4 months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is somewhat thinner but also notably heavier. Both devices in this comparison use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
Vivo X60 Pro features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Vivo X60 Pro features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel number per inch in the screen.
The vivo X60 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture and a camera with a much higher resolution. Vivo X60 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 have quite similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.