Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a global score of 79, which is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. These devices have Android OS, but Xperia XZ2 Compact has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, counting with some nice extra features. The Xperia XZ2 Compact is a way older and incredibly thicker phone than vivo X60 Pro, but Sony managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels per screen inch.
Vivo X60 Pro has a greater memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Vivo X60 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much higher resolution back camera, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.