Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is just a bit better than the Xperia XZs, with a 78.8 score against 77.2. The vivo X60 Pro is a notably newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Xperia XZs, although it's just a bit heavier. The vivo X60 Pro has a quite better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has more processing cores and 8 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. The Xperia XZs has a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a tinier camera aperture, a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality, a lot worse 19 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse video resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.